Green growth: are we still on the road to a sustainable recovery?
Countries have pledged to spend billions on sustainable growth initiatives post-Covid. But is the ‘green recovery’ now at risk?
When the global economy came to a crashing halt in March 2020, savvy world leaders spotted an opportunity. Supporting the recovery from Covid would require large-scale investments, they reasoned, so why not spend the money on policies that both boosted growth and supported longer-term environmental goals?
Since then, the idea of a ‘green recovery’ from the pandemic has taken hold. Countries in every region have pledged to boost investment in areas like renewable energy, sustainable transport and green innovation. And by April 2022, around a third of all post-Covid recovery spending – some $1.1tn – could be classed as having a ‘positive’ environmental impact, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
That said, the world now finds itself facing a new economic crisis, with soaring inflation threatening to unleash another global recession in 2023. And there’s a risk that green investments could be postponed or pulled.
Countries including the UK, US and Germany are also actively expanding domestic production of fossil fuels as they seek to protect future energy supplies in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Bold steps
So, can the green recovery remain on track? Certainly, bold steps have been taken since 2020, says Brian O'Callaghan, lead researcher and project manager of the Oxford University Economic Recovery Project, which has been monitoring government investments in green recovery initiatives.
And while some countries have not lived up to their rhetoric on a green recovery, the flurry of activity shows that most have woken up to the opportunities, he says.
“Our research shows that if a government chooses to intervene during an economic slowdown, green initiatives are now a stronger economic solution than many traditional initiatives. It is no longer an either/or on growth and climate.”
One of the biggest achievements so far has been the US Inflation Reduction Act, passed in August, which earmarked $369bn for clean energy initiatives, in what will be America’s largest ever investment in climate. US consumers will get incentives to purchase new and second-hand electric cars, to warm their homes with heat pumps and even to cook their food using electric induction.
It is no longer an either/or on growth and climate
Electricity generators will also get 10 years of tax credits to supply more wind and solar power, which will lead to more renewable energy being supplied to the market.
Taken with other measures, the act is likely to cut US emissions by 40% below 2005 levels, according to analysis from the Rhodium Group. Some say it does not go far enough, but O’Callaghan believes the bill’s investments are so large that they will influence global energy prices and impact the energy transition in other countries.
Electric cars
Other promising post-Covid initiatives include the UK’s 10-point plan for a “green industrial revolution”, announced by former PM Boris Johnson in November 2020, the height of the pandemic. The £12bn strategy aims to tackle climate change and create jobs in industries such as nuclear energy.
Its marquee policy is an electric vehicle mandate, that will ban the sale of new cars and vans powered wholly by petrol or diesel from 2030. The government also hopes to quadruple offshore wind power, boost hydrogen production capacity and expand nuclear as a clean energy source.
Certainly, green recovery plans demonstrate the art of the possible. But it’s important to remember they are only one part of a much larger push towards a green transition which faces countless obstacles. Not least, many governments still provide ongoing subsidies for environmentally damaging activities such as fossil fuel production, and the OECD says that spending will soon cancel out the $1.1tn committed globally to green recovery plans to date.
Sue Riddlestone OBE, chief executive of the British sustainability charity Bioregional, which advises businesses on the transition to zero carbon, thinks governments must go much further if they want businesses and other heavy carbon emitters to lower their footprints. She notes that in 2021, three-quarters of UK SMEs were yet to implement a comprehensive decarbonisation strategy, with many confused about how to do so.
“The government should make it mandatory for all businesses to report their carbon emissions, and provide clear definitions, guidance and a reporting framework that makes it straightforward for them to do so,” she says.
Practical steps
Firms can also take matters into their own hands, she says, calculating their own carbon footprints and embracing frameworks such as the Science Based Targets initiative, which validates businesses’ net zero plans. They can also discuss energy efficiency with their landlords, switch to renewable energy, cut back on business travel, engage staff in net zero action plans and collaborate with other businesses on green initiatives with the help of trade groups.
Make UK, the manufacturing trade group, says that most of its members see soaring energy bills as their number one concern right now. Yet they also see becoming energy efficient as a way of cutting costs and emissions simultaneously.
Many are implementing energy saving measures such as using LED lights and building energy management systems, says Brigitte Amoruso, an energy and environment specialist at Make UK. Some are even generating their own power from renewables on site, using solar panels, heat pumps, wind or biomass technology. “They are killing two birds with one stone, reducing carbon emissions and energy costs,” Amoruso says.
Private capital will also play a key role in any green shift, say experts, influencing decisions at a board level. Institutional investors are increasingly pressuring the biggest listed companies to up their sustainability games, and those companies are starting to listen.
“Investors can vote at company annual general meetings to support or challenge how the board is managing climate risks and opportunities,” says Tessa Younger, head of engagement at PIRC, one of the world’s best-known shareholder advisory groups.
While such resolutions are rarely binding, she says, they send an important message. “Those companies that genuinely engage with shareholders and seek to set out a clearly thought through decarbonisation strategy are likely to have received greater levels of shareholder support.”
Green recovery investments alone won’t solve the climate crisis, but they should help to accelerate other plans afoot to reach net zero. Covid has created a golden opportunity for policymakers to put sustainability at the heart of their growth agendas, and it is already spurring businesses to invest more in their own transitions.
“The enormous boost of public funds to green and green-adjacent markets is already crowding-in private capital,” says O’Callaghan. “Public capital is not the solution to the climate crisis, but it does have an important role to play in accelerating private investment.”