Making the switch to electric vehicles cost-effective for fleets
As governments worldwide push to replace petrol- and diesel-powered cars with electric vehicles, companies will also have to make the transition so fleets can go green
Governments across the world are passing laws to replace vehicles powered by internal combustion engines (ICEs) by electric vehicles (EVs) in the coming years. It is part of a global push toward zero-emissions transport that has intensified since the 2015 UN Paris agreement on climate change, which included a detailed declaration on the importance of electromobility.
Fleet managers will be part of the transition from petrol- and diesel-powered vehicles to EVs, along with millions of drivers globally. The deadlines are looming. In the UK and many European countries, new ICE car and van sales (excluding some hybrids) will be banned from 2030. The deadline is 2035 for California and in Spain, Canada and France, it is 2040.
Consumer reluctance often mirrors company concerns when it comes to purchasing EVs. According to the World Economic Forum, cost, lack of charging points, battery range and fire risk are among the main concerns despite improvements across all these areas. But, according to the Research Institute of Sweden, the fire risk for EVs may be lower than for ICE cars.
Saving costs, saving the planet
CFOs are primarily concerned with the bottom line, making cost concerns and financial benefits for the switch to electric fleets key priorities. For many companies, credible business cases still need to be made to persuade decision-makers to make the change, despite the clear environmental and corporate reputation benefits of accelerating the move away from petrol- and diesel-powered fleets. The International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts in its ‘Stated Policies Scenario’ that by 2030 – the deadline for banning the sale of new ICE vehicles in multiple markets – electric vehicle fleets will displace around 2.5m barrels of oil products per day and 4.2m barrels per day in its ‘Sustainable Development Scenario.’
The EV100 Progress and Insights Report by Climate Group, an international climate action non-profit, cited examples of companies that reported fleet cost savings by going electric. Austrian Post has deployed more than 1,000 EVs, particularly as a replacement for ICE vehicles on last-mile deliveries. As well as saving on fuel costs, the postal corporation’s maintenance costs have fallen by 50%. This has been bolstered by government subsidies and tax exemptions for zero-emissions vehicles. Austrian Post also improved its own charging infrastructure.
“By installing our biggest charging site, with 65 smart chargers, our intention was to take the next step in building zero-emission delivery and show that it is already possible,” said Paul Janacek, head of group fleet at Austrian Post.
Battery prices have fallen by 85% since 2010 and as more EV models come to market, fleet buyers will have more choice across a wider range of price points. Economies of scale and wider mass market acceptance is also bringing purchase and lease costs down
The cost of EVs, plus installing charging infrastructure at workplaces can deter some companies from replacing ICE vehicles with EVs for fleet use, but the IEA’s Global EV Outlook 2020 highlights the cost savings that can be achieved through electromobility. Battery prices have fallen by 85% since 2010 and as more EV models come to market, fleet buyers will have more choice across a wider range of price points. Economies of scale and wider mass market acceptance is also bringing purchase and lease costs down.
A study by the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Idaho National Laboratory found that significant cost savings can be made by operating EVs instead of ICE vehicles. Depending on electricity tariffs, the study found that switching to EVs corresponded to an average lifetime fuel cost saving of between $3,000 and $10,500 per vehicle.
Calls for stronger government policy to help fleets
While companies can glean significant tax benefits (see box below) and long-term savings by adding EVs to fleets and offering employees salary sacrifice schemes, there are calls for governments to do more to make switching to zero-emissions motoring easier for fleet managers.
In the US, fleet operators and Ceres, a non-profit for sustainable economic transformation, have called on President Joe Biden’s administration to set stricter nationwide emissions and fuel economy standards for ICE vehicles engines as the transition to zero-emissions transport gathers pace, rather than leaving such initiatives to individual states, such as California.
The World Economic Forum, meanwhile, has urged more widespread road pricing to encourage EV takeup. Fleets are already experiencing cost savings through exemptions from road pricing schemes for EVs in which vehicles with higher emissions pay more to use roads, especially in major cities.
China and the EU have been praised by the World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCD) for encouraging swift market change among fleet decision-makers, such as incentives for EV adoption, funding more charging infrastructure and battery storage facilities, and developing renewable energy sources for greener charging, especially as part of Covid-19 pandemic recovery programmes. This has been particularly prevalent in the EU and China.
“Covid-19 underlined society’s need for resilience and shock-preparedness. The crisis is also pushing countries, cities and leading businesses to ramp up efforts to decarbonise,” says Thomas Deloison, director of mobility at the WBCSD. “Going electric makes economic sense today, and will soon be a precondition to operate in cities where zero-emission zones will be the norm."
Is salary sacrifice worth considering?
Salary sacrifice is another strategy companies can use to encourage employees to embrace EVs. Such a scheme allows non-company car drivers to pay for an electric car each month. For the employee, the EV is not taxed based on the salary that is given up; instead tax is paid on the value of the benefit-in-kind (BIK). BIK is a taxable value for the the benefit received, calculated as a percentage of the list price. For EVs, it is 1% for 2021-22 and 2% for 2022-23.
There can be tax benefits for employers who offer such a scheme. In the UK, for example, employers can save 20% on income tax and 12% on National Insurance contributions, says Matthew Walters, LeasePlan UK's head of consultancy services. He said the lease agreement is between the employer and the lease company so it is technically a company car, but the employee reimburses the company for the monthly rental cost. Such schemes are being utilised by public sector employers as well as private companies. In England, the Northumbria National Health Service Foundation Trust has ordered 500 Nissan Leaf EVs for staff to lease in a salary sacrifice scheme.